In some cases, DNA evidence is used to overturn convictions that were previously upheld by a jury. The accused may have maintained their innocence, but the jury believed they were guilty. Later, DNA evidence proves that the accused was telling the truth all along, and they are exonerated.
One interesting issue researchers have found, however, is that some individuals who are later cleared of crimes initially confessed to committing them. Why would someone admit to breaking the law when they did not? Here are a few potential reasons.
Long interrogations and manipulation
Research shows that many false confessions come after extremely lengthy interrogations, often lasting 16 hours or more. Additionally, some individuals are manipulated by law enforcement officers who may lie about the evidence they claim to have or use intimidation tactics to extract a confession. This problem is especially common with young offenders, who may not fully comprehend the implications of their admission.
Language barriers and intellectual disabilities
False confessions can also occur when individuals have intellectual disabilities or face language barriers. For example, someone who does not speak English as their first language might not understand the questions and inadvertently admit to a crime they didn’t commit.
Taking the fall for someone else
In some cases, a person may confess to a crime to protect someone else. For instance, a passenger in a vehicle with a repeat DUI offender might switch seats with the driver after an accident and take the blame to prevent the driver from receiving another DUI charge.
The importance of legal representation
These scenarios illustrate the critical need for anyone accused of a crime to fully understand the legal process. To avoid false confessions and other issues, it can help to work with an experienced criminal defense firm.
